Message Received, Loud and Clear: Pandemic Shows Society Falling Short of Statute’s Vision
By Marcia Scazufca Scientific Researcher, Instituto de Psiquiatria Universidade de São Paulo
October 1, 2021, marked the 18th anniversary of the enactment of Brazil’s Statute of the Elderly, which provides specific rights for those over 60 years old. Development and enactment of the statute is a great achievement of Brazilian society. Its existence is particularly relevant for individuals who were born at a time when aging with dignity, respect, and social protection was a privilege of the few and was not considered to be an important part of the social agenda.
Particularly given that Brazil is home to over 30 million people age 60 and older,1 the 18th anniversary of the Statute of the Elderly should be a cause exclusively for pride, celebration, and discussion. However, that is not the current situation. NGOs, politicians, and the media commemorated the date while also warning about the setbacks facing Brazil’s social policies for supporting older adults. Senator Paulo Paim, who proposed the law that created the Statute of the Elderly, even noted, “We have to make [the Statute] a reality effectively. It needs to be fully implemented in every municipality in the country.“2 The pandemic has only exacerbated perennial challenges. As the pandemic continues to send lessons and messages that have long needed to be heard, it is time to ensure that the statute truly becomes a way of Brazilians’ everyday life.
System Strain: Hidden Cracks Revealed
Approximately 75 percent of older Brazilians are dependent on the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS, the National Health Service).3 SUS was created by the 1988 Constitution to offer health services to all Brazilians free of charge. This system is also responsible for monitoring and improving the health of older adults. When the pandemic struck, its flaws became evident. The SUS could not effectively handle the crisis, nor could it monitor the pandemic on a national level. The public hospital system collapsed in several parts of the country4 because of hospital overcrowding, a lack of ICU beds, and a lack of available technicians, nurses, and doctors.5 Many previously scheduled in-person surgeries and other medical appointments were cancelled, hindering the treatment of older individuals with chronic health conditions.6 Furthermore, most of Brazil’s approximately 400,000 Community Health Workers7 did not feel adequately trained nor protected to continue working in a pandemic.8